A Forum for Education about and Involvement in Ending Violence Against Women and Girls
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Shoe Revolt
Super cool! I found out about this organization and I wanted to share. This program has great room to grow, but it also has a strong start.
This program is a partnership program. Individuals put shoes up for consignment and as the seller, you get to designate to which organization the money for your shoes goes. All of the organizations included provide long-term residential services for victims of sexual exploitation and/or human trafficking.
Don't get caught up thinking that shoes are just for women or that the prices are going to be too high. This program approaches trafficking and sexual exploitation as a human rights issue. There are a myriad of ways to get involved. And the shoes are priced reasonably at ranges of $10 and up.
Check out Shoe Revolt. It is definitely worth your time!
Friday, August 5, 2011
Sugar Daddies, Sugar Mommies & Sugar Babies?
Today's topic was introduced 5 days ago. The idea that female college students are unable to pay off college loans or debt and consequently are seeking a wealthy male counterpart to provide monetary benefits in exchange for escort services.
The first article I read was titled, "Seeking Arrangement: College Students Using 'Sugar Daddies' to Pay Off Loan Debt." Following this, I found articles/entries titled, "Sugar Babies: Female College Grads End Up in World's Oldest Profession." "On the Legality of Sugar Daddies," "Prostitution to Pay for College," "Is it prostitution? Website Helps Female Students Pay Off Debts by Dating 'Sugar Daddies."
The website all of these articles and discussions come back to is seekingarrangement.com. This site caters to men and women seeking Sugar Daddies, Sugar Mommies, Sugar Babies (Male or Female). This site has exploded. It is estimated to have 800, 000 members.
So, the idea is that individuals, the articles all focused on female college students even though the site does cater to both men and women, are unable to pay off debt nowadays. This website hooks up an in-debt college student identified as a 'sugar baby' with a wealthy male or female counterpart known as a 'sugar daddy' or 'sugar mommy.' It is expected that sex will be exchanged for money and expensive items. The articles quote men providing female sugar babies $350-$500 per meeting (though these were just the quoted amounts).
Other websites performing the same services include: http: http://seekingtuition.com/ and http://www.sugardaddymeet.com/
The idea of prostitution is heavily debated. To legalize or not to legalize, that is the question. Do these individuals even view themselves as participating in prostitution? The answer: no.
Many of the women in these articles do not identify themselves as participating in prostitution. Rather, they are simply performing a task that has to get done...must pay off debt. The men identify themselves as humanitarians. They are able to help these women. In one of the articles a man identifies himself as helping a woman pay off "good debt" because it is from school, not simply credit cards.
My main concern is the idea of exploitation. Are these wealthy men and women taking advantage of and exploiting the desperation of these debt-laden college students? I'd argue that exploitation is built in to websites like this. They are clearly made for individuals who are unable to meet their financial needs/costs. They are different from match.com, eharmony.com, etc. b/c they are not strictly for dating. The men and women are not seeking long-term companionship and don't believe the individuals they meet with are their sole mates (as is the premise of match and eharmony).
Should websites like these be closed down? Should these individuals be arrested for prostitution? (Note: prostitutes are given much heavier sentences when arrested than Johns are--so this means college students theoretically would be sentences more harshly than sugar daddies/sugar mommies).
The first article I read was titled, "Seeking Arrangement: College Students Using 'Sugar Daddies' to Pay Off Loan Debt." Following this, I found articles/entries titled, "Sugar Babies: Female College Grads End Up in World's Oldest Profession." "On the Legality of Sugar Daddies," "Prostitution to Pay for College," "Is it prostitution? Website Helps Female Students Pay Off Debts by Dating 'Sugar Daddies."
The website all of these articles and discussions come back to is seekingarrangement.com. This site caters to men and women seeking Sugar Daddies, Sugar Mommies, Sugar Babies (Male or Female). This site has exploded. It is estimated to have 800, 000 members.
So, the idea is that individuals, the articles all focused on female college students even though the site does cater to both men and women, are unable to pay off debt nowadays. This website hooks up an in-debt college student identified as a 'sugar baby' with a wealthy male or female counterpart known as a 'sugar daddy' or 'sugar mommy.' It is expected that sex will be exchanged for money and expensive items. The articles quote men providing female sugar babies $350-$500 per meeting (though these were just the quoted amounts).
Other websites performing the same services include: http: http://seekingtuition.com/ and http://www.sugardaddymeet.com/
The idea of prostitution is heavily debated. To legalize or not to legalize, that is the question. Do these individuals even view themselves as participating in prostitution? The answer: no.
Many of the women in these articles do not identify themselves as participating in prostitution. Rather, they are simply performing a task that has to get done...must pay off debt. The men identify themselves as humanitarians. They are able to help these women. In one of the articles a man identifies himself as helping a woman pay off "good debt" because it is from school, not simply credit cards.
My main concern is the idea of exploitation. Are these wealthy men and women taking advantage of and exploiting the desperation of these debt-laden college students? I'd argue that exploitation is built in to websites like this. They are clearly made for individuals who are unable to meet their financial needs/costs. They are different from match.com, eharmony.com, etc. b/c they are not strictly for dating. The men and women are not seeking long-term companionship and don't believe the individuals they meet with are their sole mates (as is the premise of match and eharmony).
Should websites like these be closed down? Should these individuals be arrested for prostitution? (Note: prostitutes are given much heavier sentences when arrested than Johns are--so this means college students theoretically would be sentences more harshly than sugar daddies/sugar mommies).
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Sexual Assault, DV and long-term mental health
(Health.com) -- Women are drastically more likely to develop a mental disorder at some point in their lives if they have been the victim of rape, sexual assault, stalking, or intimate-partner violence, according to a new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
While the connection between these harrowing experiences and poor mental health is hardly surprising, experts say the new findings highlight just how strongly the two problems are intertwined -- and how important it is for doctors and other health-care workers to ask women about past episodes of violence, even if they happened years ago.
"When professionals are treating women with depression or mental health issues, it's best to be clued in to the fact that violence might be behind [it]," says Andrea Gielen, Sc.D., director for the Center for Injury Research and Policy at Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, who was not involved in the study.
Researchers in Australia analyzed health data from a nationally representative sample of Australian women between the ages of 16 and 85. Episodes of sexual assault, stalking, and other "gender-based violence" were all too common, with 27% of the group reporting at least one episode of abuse.
Fifty-seven percent of the women with a history of abuse also had a history of depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress, substance abuse, or anxiety (including panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder), versus 28% of the women who had not experienced gender-based violence.
Among women who had been exposed to at least three different types of violence, the rate of mental disorders or substance abuse rose to 89%.
"The extent and strength of the association we found was surprising and very concerning," says lead author Susan Rees, Ph.D., a senior research fellow in psychiatry at the University of New South Wales, in Sydney.
Rees and her colleagues can't say for sure whether the mental health problems in the study were triggered by the violence, or whether women with preexisting mental health issues were more likely to experience violence. (They did, however, control for a range of potential mitigating factors, including socioeconomic status and a family history of psychiatric problems.)
But there is "ample evidence" that traumatic events -- especially interpersonal traumatic events, such as domestic abuse -- can trigger mental problems, Rees says.
Moreover, she adds, episodes of gender-based violence often occur very early in life, whereas mental disorders often don't surface until years later.
Rates of gender-based violence in the U.S. and Australia are comparable, so a study of this kind conducted in the U.S. would likely yield similar results, Rees says. Roughly one-fifth of women in the U.S. say they have experienced intimate-partner violence (which includes domestic abuse), stalking, or both, and 17% say they have been victims of rape or attempted rape, according to the study.
The findings drive home that violence against women is a major public health concern.
"It underscores the impact on society as more than just the immediate consequences, more than just treating women in an emergency department for a violent injury," Gielen says.
Mental health specialists and providers of women's health services should collaborate and develop a unified approach to more effectively screen and treat mental health problems in women who have experienced violence, Rees and her colleagues say.
The U.S. has already taken a promising step in this direction, Gielen says. On Monday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued new guidelines for preventive care for women that, among other things, require all new health plans to offer no-cost domestic-violence screenings to women beginning in August 2012.
"Almost every public health organization in the country recommends screening for violence, so we're in a really good situation to really move forward," Gielen says. "The big challenge, though, is to work toward what happens after screening: How do we make [screenings] maximally effective, to make sure they really help women?"
Those questions may soon be addressed in the federal Violence Against Women Act, which is up for reauthorization this year. The renewal of the law may provide opportunities for grants, community interventions, and training programs for mental health professionals, Gielen says.
"I think this study really sets up a very hopeful future for providing help to these women who really need it," she says.
Copyright Health Magazine 2010
--------------------------------
I came across this article today and it just screamed intersectionality. You know, the idea that no one person is the same and that consequently it is necessary to note the multiple dimensions of ones life. For example, race, age, sex, religion, experience, and of course, mental health. I find that many people forget about mental health when considering intersectionality. In my opinion, this is a grave mistake. This article suggests that individuals who experience sexual assault and/or DV are at an increased likelihood of also experiencing lasting mental health issues. Makes sense I think. But, do we consider this when we see someone attempting to leave? Do we think about the mental health of a survivor years after the abuse has ended/been escaped? Take note b/c the experience lasts a lifetime. We need to remember that everyone experiences things differently and we need to be sensitive to this.
A few things to think about related to intersectionality:
1) Do we need different programs/treatment for women of different sexual orientations? If you're in an opposite-sex or same-sex relationship, might the elements of abuse be different?
2) How might race affect the dynamics of abuse or help-seeking when experiencing violence (physical, emotional, psychological, etc) in an intimate relationship?
Any thoughts? I'd love to hear them :)
Monday, August 1, 2011
India's SlutWalk
SlutWalk's have become a widely experienced global phenomenon. In fact, India has just had it's first SlutWalk in Delhi. Concerns in India were numerous as organizers attempted to prepare for Slutwalks. Concerns of indecency, the name "Slutwalk," and other possibilities concerned officials and members of the public alike. It has been reported that there were several differences noted when comparing this walk with those of other locations. Not only were participants unable to march as far as they were previously thought to be allowed, but the event was smaller and tamer, and security was heavy. Estimates believe there may have been 2 security for every 1 participant (including media).
Regardless of the differences, the message was the same. Ending sexual violence is absolutely necessary.
You can read more about the SlutWalk here, here and here.
Pictures can be viewed here.
Regardless of the differences, the message was the same. Ending sexual violence is absolutely necessary.
You can read more about the SlutWalk here, here and here.
Pictures can be viewed here.
Saturday, July 30, 2011
Reproductive Coercion: Pregnancy as a form of Violence against Women
I've been interested in reproductive coercion for several years. My interest began when I assisted as a researcher on a project about teen parenting. There was quite a bit of discussion around one teen telling his/her partner that they needed to have a baby for a, b, or c reason. One teen would tell the other that protection was being used, when in reality there was none being used. Reproductive coercion has been discussed in America in 2 primary ways and is most certainly NOT only related to teenagers.
The first way you might hear about reproductive coercion is pregnancy as a means of boosting the U.S. economy. The argument is that when women birth many children, the U.S. benefits economically, demographically, and in numerous other ways. This argument makes some sense--think about the Baby Boom era--but what is forgotten is this idea that women, and the babies they have, become a strategy. The value of human life and the value of a woman as a human being gets lost. Recently I read an article on this very topic. It was published in the Boulder Weekly and was written by the keynote speaker from SlutWalk Denver, Pamela White. The article is entitled, Women are Not Farms. I love this! I think this is a perfect title. This idea that women can birth numerous children to boost various facets of our society is simply dehumanizing the individuals, the notion of family (in all forms), and is known as reproductive coercion.
Now, as mentioned above, there is a second way you may hear words reproductive coercion. This is the way I used it in my opening and also the way that I am most familiar in hearing it used. Reproductive coercion may also be a tool against a woman--there has been some research in the realm of teen dating violence regarding this topic. Essentially, this is the notion that in opposite-sex relationships, men actively attempt to get their female partners pregnant. Male partners might take condoms off during sexual intercourse, might break condoms on purpose, or might flush birth control pills down the toilet if found. So, here's the situation: female doesn't want to get pregnant. Attempts to be responsible by getting birth control pills. Male partner won't let her take the pills. Guilt trips, words of affection, and talk of future lives may also be common and convincing for these women. "Honey, we're going to have beautiful babies." "If you loved me, you'd have a baby with me." On the opposite side, pregnancy coercion is involved as well. Men might state that they'll leave the woman if she doesn't have a child with him. He might say he'll hit her if she uses birth control.
Don't be fooled, numbers are much too high for experiencing reproductive coercion. This is not an uncommon experience for women. If you'd like to hear about this in greater detail, check out this podcast by Dr. Elizabeth Miller (author of Pregnancy Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence and Unintended Pregnancy).
Wednesday, July 27, 2011
Urge to Let Women Drive in Saudi Arabia
From HuffPost Women
Fourteen Female U.S. Senators Urge Saudi King To Grant Women Right To Drive
While most of Washington was stuck in the ideological gridlock of the debt ceiling debate, a bipartisan coalition of female Senators came together Tuesday to urge King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia to finally allow the women of his country to drive legally. Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world that bars women from driving a vehicle -- bicycles included.
Fourteen of the 17 female senators, including Democrats and Republicans, signed a letter to the Saudi king that reads, in part:
"As women members of the United States Senate, we write in support of the increasing number of Saudi women and men calling for the removal of the driving ban on women in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As you know, Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world with such a ban on women driving, and maintaining such a restriction stands in stark contrast with the commitments your government has made to promote the rights of Saudi women.”
This consortium was led by Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.). Others who signed included Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine).
While the letter acknowledges that the king has appointed Saudi Arabia's first female deputy minister and has created a university that allows men and women to study side by side (and drive side by side on streets enclosed by the campus walls), the senators assert that "more must be done" and that lifting the driving ban is a critical step in the right direction.
Although women have defied the ban periodically since the 1990s, the campaign to end the archaic law gained traction in May when 32-year-old engineer Manal al-Sharif was imprisoned for over a week after she defied the unwritten but heavily enforced ban. Dubbed the "Saudi Rosa Parks," al-Sharif posted a video of her freedom drive on Youtube.
Mobilized via a Facebook campaign, a group of 30 to 40 more Saudi women got behind the wheel in dissent on June 17th, and they have been driving ever since. In the past month, several have reportedly been arrested.
In a press release, Change.org called the demonstrator's resistance the largest women's rights protest in Saudi History, noting that the protest has spread far beyond the Middle East. The organization claims that its group Saudi Women for Driving has garnered the support of over 160,000 people from over 156 countries through social media.
The Senators' letter rides on the coattails of that social media campaign, which successfully urged Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to speak out in support of Saudi women's right to drive.
After a Change.org petition urging the Secretary to take a stand against the driving ban reached over 20,000 signatures, Clinton quit what a State Department spokesperson described as "quiet diplomacy" and publicly announced, “What these women are doing is brave and what they are seeking is right… I am moved by it and I support them.”
After a Change.org petition urging the Secretary to take a stand against the driving ban reached over 20,000 signatures, Clinton quit what a State Department spokesperson described as "quiet diplomacy" and publicly announced, “What these women are doing is brave and what they are seeking is right… I am moved by it and I support them.”
Saudi Women for Driving recently petitioned Subaru to stop selling cars to Saudi Arabia until women have the right to drive.
Monday, July 25, 2011
American Indian Women Targeted
Statistics support the notion that crimes against American Indian Women are of epidemic proportions. In fact, 1/3 of Native women will be raped in their lifetimes and nearly 3 out of 5 will be assaulted by a partner.
I frequently encounter questions about this population in regard to how crimes against women are handled within this sect of the population. Questions about whether crimes are handled within the tribe or within larger government corrections are most frequently asked. Currently, Justice Department officials are seeking greater purview over reservations. One of the primary reasons for this is that sentences on reservations would then more closely mirror the sentences offenders receive within state courts for committing the same offenses.
Similarly, changes in law would also allow tribes to prosecute both Native and non-Native offenders within their tribal courts.
Essentially, Congress is currently attempting to close several primary gaps within legislation. It seems the proposed bill targets such things as protection order enforcement, partner violence, and sentencing. Check out this article for greater detail.
In the meantime, if you were surprised by the statistics presented above regarding the disproportionate amount of violence perpetrated against American Indian Women, I strongly encourage you to check out the book "Conquest" by Andrea Smith.
I frequently encounter questions about this population in regard to how crimes against women are handled within this sect of the population. Questions about whether crimes are handled within the tribe or within larger government corrections are most frequently asked. Currently, Justice Department officials are seeking greater purview over reservations. One of the primary reasons for this is that sentences on reservations would then more closely mirror the sentences offenders receive within state courts for committing the same offenses.
Similarly, changes in law would also allow tribes to prosecute both Native and non-Native offenders within their tribal courts.
Essentially, Congress is currently attempting to close several primary gaps within legislation. It seems the proposed bill targets such things as protection order enforcement, partner violence, and sentencing. Check out this article for greater detail.
In the meantime, if you were surprised by the statistics presented above regarding the disproportionate amount of violence perpetrated against American Indian Women, I strongly encourage you to check out the book "Conquest" by Andrea Smith.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



